Correlation is not causation
Matching patterns don’t prove one caused the other.
Ice cream sales and drowning incidents both rise in summer. Does eating ice cream cause people to drown? Of course not. Warmer weather brings more swimmers and more ice cream consumption. Similarly, countries with more refrigerators tend to have higher obesity rates. Does owning a fridge make people gain weight? Clearly not. Greater national wealth allows more people to afford both refrigerators and richer diets.
Just because two patterns move together (correlation) doesn’t mean one causes the other (causation). Our minds naturally search for cause and effect. When two things happen together, we tend to assume one drives the other. This helped humans survive by spotting patterns, like noticing that eating certain berries caused sickness or drinking unsafe water made them ill. But this tendency also makes us prone to jumping to conclusions when the link isn’t real.
Mistaking correlation for causation is like thinking the rooster crowing at dawn light makes the sun rise.
Getting it wrong can have real consequences:
👉 Everyday life: Wearing a “lucky” shirt or betting on certain numbers may seem to cause wins, but these patterns are coincidental. Mistaking correlation for causation may seem harmless, but it reinforces poor reasoning and superstition over time.
👉 Health and diet: Foods or supplements may seem to cause better health, but in reality, healthier people may be more likely to use them. Acting on this mistake can waste money or distract from proven choices.
👉 Relationships: Arguing may seem to cause breakups, but both are usually driven by deeper incompatibility or unresolved issues. Misreading the connection can lead to ignoring serious problems.
👉 Policy decisions: Higher education spending may seem to cause better student performance, yet advantages like more involved parents and access to tutors drive both. Misreading this link can lead to policies that miss the real issues.
👉 Climate and weather: Unusually cold winters or powerful hurricanes may seem to prove or disprove global warming, but short-term weather patterns can’t confirm or refute long-term climate trends. Confusing the two can distort how we understand evidence and lead to poor decisions.
👉 Technology and mental health: More screen time may seem to cause poor mental health, but stress, sleep habits, and social environment influence both. Misreading this link can lead to misguided advice or unnecessary worry.
👉 Finance and investing: A stock’s recent gains may seem to signal a winning strategy, but broader market trends or economic factors often drive both performance and investor behavior. Misreading this link can lead to risky decisions or unnecessary losses.
How to avoid the trap when stakes are high
For high-stakes decisions, such as those involving physical or emotional health, money, or safety, don’t act on correlation alone. Use these techniques to avoid mistaking correlation for causation.
👉 Ask what else could explain it: Look for other factors that might influence both variables. For example, ice cream sales and shark attacks both rise in summer, but warmer weather increases both swimming and ice cream consumption.
👉 Check for a plausible mechanism: Make sure there’s a logical reason one thing could cause the other. It makes sense that studying more leads to better grades, but owning a laptop correlating with grades doesn’t prove it improves learning.
👉 Confirm the sequence: Cause must come before effect. Don’t assume people get stressed because they check social media, when stress might actually drive more social media use.
👉 Examine consistency and size: Strong, repeatable patterns are more trustworthy than small, sporadic ones. Smoking clearly causes lung disease. But seeing that people who eat breakfast seem happier for a week doesn’t mean breakfast causes happiness.
👉 Look for controlled evidence: Experiments or studies that isolate variables give stronger proof than simple observation. Randomized drug trials show whether a treatment works, whereas anecdotal health improvements can be misleading.
🎉👏🎈
Correlation doesn’t equal causation. Just because ice cream sales rise with drowning incidents doesn’t mean one causes the other. Question causal claims, seek evidence, and make decisions based on real cause and effect.
